When you make decisions without knowing your current level
QE Assessment: The 2-Week Diagnosis, with Evidence for the Executive Committee
We diagnose your QA practice with Omniatest® and the QMO 360° methodology, so you can invest in quality with evidence, not intuition.
Trusted by organizations that have already diagnosed their QA maturity with evidence, not intuition
Three Scenarios, One Business Risk
The problem isn’t the lack of an assessment; it’s what’s missing behind it: strategy, architecture, and method
In most organizations, no one has formally measured their QA practice, or it was measured only once and in isolation. And when the assessment isn’t designed with strategy and method, the business absorbs the risk.
Without Diagnosis
No one has formally measured the real state of the QA practice. Investment decisions (hiring, certifying, automating) are made based on perception, not on evidence shared by the teams involved.
Diagnosis Without Methodology
Internal self-assessments or informal surveys exist, but without a reference model (TMMi/ISTQB) that allows for objective comparison or presenting credible results to the executive committee.
Diagnosis Without Governance
Tools like Jira or TestRail generate isolated metrics that no one connects into a single overview. AI, when it exists, lives in scattered reports that no team prioritizes with business criteria.
Whatever your scenario, the root cause is the same: your QA practice assessment is not designed with the strategy and method the business needs. That’s what we diagnose, regardless of your starting point.
The cost of not diagnosing your QA practice doesn’t appear in the IT budget; it appears in the business results
Annual cost of poor software quality, with $1.52B accumulated in technical debt that no one measured in time
– CISQ, cited in Gartner, November 2024
| 70% |
Of projects that fail due to quality, |
| 38% |
Of engineering leaders trust |
Where does the real cost appear in your organization?
Investments without evidence. Every quality investment decision is made with intuition, not with a diagnosis shared by stakeholders
Budget approved without an investment case. The committee approves or rejects the QA budget without a case showing the expected return
Symptoms attacked, not causes. No one knows if the problem lies with people, process, or governance, so symptoms are attacked, not causes
Gaps discovered in audits. Every audit or due diligence (M&A) uncovers gaps that already existed but no one had measured
AI without a maturity baseline. While other organizations use AI to diagnose quality, yours still measures maturity with informal surveys or doesn’t measure it at all
Roadmap that prioritizes the urgent. The improvement roadmap, if it exists, prioritizes the urgent of the day, not what most impacts the business
MTP Assessment, Omniatest® · QMO 360° · TMMi/ISTQB · Controlled AI
We measure against the standard we ourselves meet
It’s not a generic checklist: it’s the highest standard that exists, and it’s the one we ourselves operate. First TMMi Level 5 company in the world.
We Measure Against the Standard We Meet
Fixed Scope and Time, Not Open Hours
AI that Evaluates with Real Evidence from Your Stack
A Dashboard that Supports the Diagnosis
Results the business recognizes, not just the technical team
Investment Decisions with Evidence
The committee approves the QA budget with an investment case, not a hunch. Diagnosis shared by stakeholders involving QA, Development, Product, and Operations.
Gaps Prioritized by Business Impact
You know what to tackle first: what costs the business the most, not the most urgent thing of the day. The roadmap is built by real impact, not perceived urgency.
Audits and Due Diligence Without Surprises
Gaps are already mapped and documented before a regulator or buyer finds them. Compliance as a maturity criterion from the diagnosis, not as a separate review.
Diagnosis with Data from Your Own Tools
AI connects your real stack—Jira, Azure DevOps, TestRail, Jenkins—to cross-reference real pipeline evidence with what was gathered in interviews. Not just what people remember.
A Clear Path to Maturity
The roadmap connects directly with the Implementation of Best QA Practices when you decide to move forward. Quick wins in 30-60 days and 12-month milestones with owners and metrics.
Diagnosis that Cross-References People, Processes, and Governance
QMO 360° does not evaluate isolated tools or processes: it cross-references the three dimensions that determine the real maturity of your QA practice into a single overview that the business can read, prioritize, and finance.
OPERATIONAL PROCESS OF THE QA MATURITY ASSESSMENT
From intuition to evidence, this is how we operate
QA Maturity Assessment Kickoff
We define scope, stakeholders to interview (QA, Development, Product, Operations), and access to your tools. Deliverable: work plan and timeline.
Data Collection with Interviews and Checklists
Structured interviews and checklists aligned with TMMi and ISTQB, covering people, processes, and governance. Real evidence, not team perceptions.
AI + Real Stack + Expert Validation
An AI engine connects with your stack (Jira, Azure DevOps, TestRail, Jenkins, GitLab) and cross-references that evidence with the interviews. Every finding undergoes expert validation before the report.
Diagnosis Under QMO 360° Methodology
We rate your practice against the TMMi/ISTQB maturity model and build the diagnosis across the 3 dimensions: people, processes, and governance.
Roadmap Prioritized by Business Impact
We prioritize gaps by business impact and build a roadmap with Quick Wins in 30-60 days and 12-month milestones with owners and tracking metrics.
Presentation to the Executive Committee
We present the diagnosis and investment case to your executive committee, with a direct path to the Implementation of Best QA Practices if you decide to move forward.
Use Cases
The Assessment in action in critical sectors
Financial Sector
Diagnosis in operation of +80 stores before a simultaneous migration of critical systems
- +80 stores diagnosed before migration
- 100% coverage in critical modules prioritized by impact
- 86% effectiveness in post-rollout stabilization
- 5.33 days average defect resolution time
“The diagnosis allowed us to prioritize correctly before scaling. The investment case had full visibility of progress from the first cut.”
— IT Director, Retail Sector
Financial Sector
Assessment identified disparate QE processes in institution with over 25 million customers
- More than 25 million potentially affected customers
- 30+ projects standardized simultaneously
- 11 years of continuous collaboration and +300 standardized projects
- Regulatory compliance as a maturity criterion from diagnosis
The Assessment identified disparate processes between projects and served as the basis for standardizing more than 30 initiatives without slowing down the regulated delivery pace.
— IT Operations Director, Banking Institution
Verified operational scale
12 years diagnosing QA maturity in Mexico’s most demanding environments
Issues Detected
Automated Test Cases
Testing Hours
Test Cases Designed
Evaluation stage
What we are most asked about the QA Maturity Assessment
What does MTP's QA Maturity Assessment include?
You receive a diagnosis shared by stakeholders, a roadmap prioritized by business impact, and an investment case ready for your executive committee. Built with interviews with QA, Development, Product, and Operations and checklists aligned with TMMi and ISTQB under the QMO 360° methodology.
How long does the QA Maturity Assessment take and what does it cost?
The QA Maturity Assessment is implemented in 2 weeks and is free of charge — it’s MTP’s entry point to any quality initiative, from TMMi certification to automation or performance. We do not bill for open workshops: we commit to a deliverable with a fixed date and content.
Does the Assessment integrate with the tools we already use?
Yes. The diagnosis connects directly with your stack —Jira, Azure DevOps, TestRail, Xray, Jenkins, GitLab— to cross-reference real evidence from your pipelines with what was gathered in interviews, without asking you to migrate tools.
How does MTP use AI in the diagnosis without compromising our regulations?
MTP’s AI accelerates evidence collection across your tools and prioritizes gaps by business impact, but every finding undergoes expert validation before entering the final report — MTP’s Controlled AI model — with regulatory compliance (ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CNBV, depending on your sector) as an evaluation criterion from the diagnosis.
What is the difference between the Assessment and the Implementation of Best QA Practices?
The QA Maturity Assessment diagnoses, with evidence, your current QA practice maturity level and builds the investment case. The Implementation of Best QA Practices is the phase where MTP executes that roadmap and standardizes processes, governance, and certifications. You can contract the Assessment independently.
What if my organization has never measured its QA maturity?
This is exactly the scenario the Assessment solves: most organizations we evaluate have never formally measured their QA practice, or did so only once in isolation. QMO 360° builds the diagnosis from where you are today, without penalizing your starting point.
Who should participate in the Assessment interviews?
The diagnosis interviews stakeholders from QA, Development, Product, and Operations, so that the result reflects the real practice and not just one team’s perspective. That’s why the resulting investment case is credible to the executive committee.
Does the Assessment serve as evidence for audits or due diligence (M&A)?
Yes. By mapping and documenting gaps before a regulator or buyer finds them, the Assessment turns compliance into a maturity criterion from the diagnosis, not a separate review that appears after the finding.
Let’s Talk About Your QE Challenges
Schedule a 30-minute call with our team and discover your QE strategy’s maturity stage, what gaps are holding you back, and concrete actions to reduce rework, accelerate releases, and demonstrate the value of your quality team.