For QA Leaders Who Want to Automate
Automation Assessment: The Diagnosis That Tells You What to Automate and in What Order
We diagnose the true maturity of your test automation against the Automation Testing Framework, to deliver a prioritized roadmap before you commit budget.
Trusted by organizations that diagnose before automating their testing in regulated sectors in Mexico
Three Scenarios, One Business Risk
The Problem Isn’t Automation, It’s What’s Missing Behind It: Strategy, Architecture, and Method
Without Automation Diagnosis
The organization decides to automate based on intuition or business pressure, without measuring if the team, tools, and process are ready to sustain it.
Diagnosis Without Objectivity
Someone ‘eyeballed’ what to automate, without scoring or business criteria — the result won’t withstand serious review by the investment committee.
Diagnosis Without Governance
They ran an isolated AI pilot, without connecting it to a roadmap or consolidated metrics that the business can track after the pilot.
Whatever your scenario, the root cause is the same: the automation diagnosis isn’t designed with the strategy and method the business needs. That’s what we design.
The Cost of Automating Without Diagnosis Doesn’t Appear in the IT Budget, It Appears in Business Results
Average global level of test automation — most operate without an objective understanding of their current standing
– Capgemini, World Quality Report 2024-25
| 90% |
By 2029, QE providers will use AI |
| 70% |
Reduction in test execution time |
| 8 years |
Average duration of relationships with MTP |
Where Does the Real Cost Appear in Your Organization?
Budget invested in scripts no one prioritized, because the decision was made by intuition or urgency
Automation projects that replicate the same bottlenecks as manual testing, because they started without diagnosis
Roadmaps without objective scoring, impossible to defend before the investment committee
Teams that automate what’s urgent for them, not what most impacts the business
Isolated AI pilots without connection to metrics or a plan the business can follow afterward
Lagging behind organizations that already prioritize with AI-assisted diagnoses in weeks, not months
Automation Testing Framework, MTP’s proprietary methodology
Why MTP for Testing Automation Assessment
We diagnose with scoring, not a checklist — we rate infrastructure, team, QA maturity, and metrics with a proprietary model aligned with Omniatest® and TMMi Level 5.
Diagnosis with a Proprietary Model, Not a Checklist
A Project with a Delivery Date, Not a Round of Meetings
Automated Scoring with Human Validation
Real Patterns from the Financial and Retail Sectors
When Automation Is Governed
Results the Business Recognizes, Not Just the Technical Team
You Know What to Automate First
The roadmap prioritizes by manual cost, frequency, and business criticality, not by intuition.
Defensible Investment Before the Committee
Scoring and gaps are documented with objective criteria, ready for presentation.
AI Where It Truly Adds Value
The Assessment defines at which point self-healing, predictive maintenance, or test case generation is appropriate, not all at once.
Framework Defined Before Writing a Script
You know what tools and architecture you need before committing budget.
Governed Roadmap, Not an Isolated Pilot
Each automation initiative is connected to metrics and a plan.
70% Reduction in Execution Time
Organizations that diagnosed before automating report improvements of up to 70% in time and 85% in maintenance.
OPERATIONAL PROCESS FOR TESTING AUTOMATION ASSESSMENT
From Blind Automation to a Prioritized Roadmap: How We Operate
Quick Assessment
We evaluate infrastructure, team, QA maturity, and metrics at an express level. We confirm if it’s worth proceeding to the full Assessment.
Kick-off and Data Collection
We map your current QA processes, test inventory, and technology stack with your team.
Automated Scoring
We rate infrastructure, team, QA maturity, and metrics with Controlled AI based on the collected information. A consultant certifies each finding.
Prioritization of Critical Tests
We identify what to automate first based on manual cost, execution frequency, and business criticality.
Risk and Zone Mapping
We place your organization in blue, green, yellow, or red, with the gaps explaining the result.
Roadmap Delivery
AI-prioritized automation plan, ready to present to the committee and start the pilot.
Experience in Environments Where Error Is Not an Option
A Case Where Prior Diagnosis Changed the Automation Outcome
Financial Sector
Banking Institution: From 3 Weeks of Manual Regression to a Prioritized Roadmap
- Concrete gaps identified in tools, QA maturity, and metrics — not just ‘lack of automation’
- Roadmap that prioritized tests with the highest frequency and business criticality first
- Automation budget directed to high-impact tests, not low-value scripts
- Reduced cycle time and business risk, without spending on low-impact tests
“The diagnosis allowed us to defend the automation investment with data, not intuition.”
— QA Leader, Financial Sector
Where Is Your Organization?
Discover Your Maturity Zone in 45 Minutes
- Blue Zone: Optimized — ready for AI-powered self-healing and predictive maintenance
- Green Zone: Managed — active quality gates, ready to scale with assisted AI
- Yellow Zone: Defined — ungoverned tools, roadmap needed before proceeding
- Red Zone: Ad Hoc — high risk of wasting budget without prior diagnosis
Verified Operational Scale
The Patterns We Know Are Already in the Roadmap You Deliver to the Committee
Years Diagnosing Automation in Mexico
Annual Test Executions Under MTP Management
First Company in the World to Achieve TMMi Level
Average Duration of Working Relationships (Years)
Evaluation Stage
Most Frequently Asked Questions About Testing Automation Assessment
Does the Assessment Evaluate the Tools We Already Use, Like Selenium, Cypress, or Playwright?
Yes — the Assessment evaluates your current stack (Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Appium, Ranorex, mabl, testRigor, among others) and its integration with CI/CD (Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitLab) as part of the infrastructure and tools scoring. The roadmap starts from what you already have, not from a generic list of recommended tools.
How Does MTP's AI Operate During the Assessment Without Jeopardizing Regulatory Compliance?
AI operates under the Controlled AI model: automated scoring is calculated based on information from your stack, test backlog, and defect history, and a consultant certifies each finding before it enters the roadmap. The diagnosis is delivered aligned with your sector’s regulators — CNBV, PCI DSS, ISO 27001 — without your data leaving your control.
What Exactly Does MTP's Automation Assessment Evaluate?
It evaluates four dimensions with proprietary scoring: infrastructure and tools (30%), team and skills (25%), QA practice maturity (25%), and metrics and scope (20%). Based on this result, your organization falls into one of four zones — blue, green, yellow, or red — and each zone defines a different strategy.
How Long Does the Assessment Take and What Do I Receive Upon Completion?
The initial Quick Assessment takes between 45 and 60 minutes; if your organization is ready to proceed, the Full Assessment delves deeper for one week into your QA processes, critical tests, and business risks. At the end, you receive an AI-prioritized automation roadmap, not a generic findings report.
What Is the Difference Between the Free Quick Assessment and the Full Assessment?
The Quick Assessment is free, takes less than an hour, and tells you if it’s worth proceeding and with what strategy. The Full Assessment is the one-week diagnosis that MTP performs based on that result, and it produces the detailed score, maturity zone, and roadmap with which you decide how to automate.
What Happens If My Organization Falls into the Red or Yellow Zone?
The roadmap adjusts to your starting point: in the red zone, we prioritize basic governance and quick wins before automating; in the yellow zone, the focus is on closing management gaps before scaling with AI. No zone is disqualifying — each defines a different strategy, not an obstacle.
Does the Assessment Work If We Don't Have Any Automation Yet?
Yes. The Assessment is designed to rate your actual starting point, including organizations in the red zone that haven’t automated anything yet. The scoring identifies what to build first — infrastructure, team, or governance — before writing the first script.
What Happens After Receiving the Roadmap If We Decide to Proceed?
The roadmap connects directly with MTP’s implementation services — Automation Testing, Autonomous Functional Testing, or QA Best Practices — depending on what the Assessment findings prioritize.
Let’s Talk About Your Testing Automation Challenges
Schedule a 30-minute session with a specialist. The free Quick Assessment maps your maturity level, most critical gaps, and roadmap, with a concrete deliverable to present to the committee.