For QA areas releasing in sprints
Agile Testing: Quality architecture that reduces risk in every sprint
We design, implement, or redesign your Agile Testing practice. We reduce recovery time from failures and accelerate releases without slowing down regulatory compliance.
Trusted by +300 active scrums in banking, retail, and telecommunications
The problem isn’t testing; it’s the methodology
What holds QA teams back in agile environments
Testing occurs outside the sprint
Testing lives in a phase after development, not within the sprint. Regression builds up, forcing a choice between releasing incomplete work or postponing functionality. The customer discovers defects first.
Testing in the sprint, without risk-based prioritization
There is testing in every sprint, but without risk-based prioritization. One or two people maintain coverage. Whatever can be finished is tested, rather than what matters.
Multi-squad without unified visibility
Multiple squads releasing in parallel without unified metrics. AI operates in silos, adding complexity. Management lacks visibility per sprint, and every release is an event of uncertainty.
Which of these scenarios is your team in today? Whatever your starting point, the root cause is the same: without testing architecture within the sprint, the business absorbs the risk. That is what we design.
The numbers behind the quality problem
Of teams reach the DORA elite level; the rest operate with regression that does not close within the sprint
— 2024 State of DevOps, Google Cloud
| 40% |
Of enterprise organizations |
| 25% |
Adoption of synthetic data |
| +300 |
Active scrums |
Where does the real cost appear in your organization?
Hotfixes that break the next sprint — emergencies that postpone functionalities committed to the business, generating technical debt and loss of trust
Fines and audit findings — CNBV, Condusef, or SOX identify releases without clear evidence of testing. The sprint proceeds without visible governance
Regression that exceeds the sprint — suites grow sprint by sprint and consume more time than the cycle can contain. A choice is made between releasing incomplete or postponing
Knowledge concentrated in one person — when they rotate, the sprint loses its criteria and coverage is diluted. The practice lives in individuals, not in the team
Eroded executive trust — production incidents do not decrease despite an apparent increase in coverage. Management stops believing in QA metrics
Lagging behind teams with governed AI — competitors are already applying AI to prioritize regression per sprint with human validation. The speed gap grows every quarter
MTP Framework, Omniatest® integrated into the agile cycle
The difference no other provider offers
Four structural reasons why our clients choose MTP for their agile environments under audit.
Exit criteria defined during refinement
Projects delivered, not hours billed
Predictive selection with human validation
+300 active scrums under recurring audits
What changes when testing is agile
What is different after working with MTP
Objective criteria for release decisions
Each sprint closes with objective criteria to decide whether to release or not. Management knows what is going to production before it arrives. The release stops being an event of uncertainty.
Faster recovery from failures
Defects detected within the sprint where they originated. Recovery time decreases. Hotfixes become the exception, not the default operating mode.
AI that prioritizes with human validation
AI prioritizes what to test based on the risk of change, with human validation. Effective coverage goes up and execution time goes down. Regression stops growing out of control.
A single dashboard for squads, vendors, and sprints
Management sees the real state of quality before the release. No more manual reports per squad that no one consolidates on time.
In-house capability in your team
We design the practice, certify the team with ISTQB, and deliver the operating model. If MTP leaves, quality continues. The capability remains in-house in your organization, not in our consultants.
Clear path to DORA Elite level
MTP’s agile maturity model places your team in one of four levels and maps the path toward predictive selection, self-healing, and zero quality hotfixes—the state that only 19% of teams reach today.
THE PROCESS
How we implement Agile Testing in your organization
Agile Quick Assessment
Team maturity, test instability, coverage gaps per critical journey, and projected return. Delivery with no obligation to hire.
Risk mapping
We identify the flows with the highest financial, regulatory, or operational risk. We prioritize what is tested first in each sprint based on real business impact.
Testing architecture
Testing pyramid: APIs, interface, performance, or data depending on the context. Quality gates per sprint with objective and measurable criteria defined with the team.
Intelligent automation
AI decides which tests to run based on the risk of change. Self-healing for existing scripts. The final decision is validated by a person, not the machine. Always.
Pipeline integration
Tests connected to the real sprint pipeline, not in parallel. Quality dashboard per sprint accessible to Management before each release.
Continuous operation
We maintain the model, progressively reduce instability, and certify the team with ISTQB. The practice remains in-house in your organization.
Proven scale
The scale that no other provider can match
Financial Sector
Stabilized pipeline with Agile Testing integrated into the sprint, releasing with confidence to Management
- +30 simultaneous initiatives in operation
- +900K annual executions
- +20K hours of operation
- Multi-vendor and multi-squad model
“We stabilized our pipeline and today we release with greater confidence to Management. Automation stopped being a risk.”
— IT Director, Financial Sector
Private Sector
From 3-month delays to controlled deliveries without deviations in SOX processes
- From 3-month delays to controlled deliveries without deviations
- Guaranteed continuity in SOX processes
- Controlled release without impact on internal customers or providers
- +300 active scrums operating under recurring audits
We were able to release our applications in a controlled manner without impact on internal customers and providers. From 3-month delays to controlled deliveries. Guaranteed continuity in SOX processes.
— IT Director, Private Sector
Verified operational scale
The scale that no other provider can match
Issues Detected
Automated Test Cases
Testing Hours
Test Cases Designed
Agile Testing FAQ
What we are asked most about our Agile Testing
How long does the Agile Quick Assessment take?
5 business days. Delivers team agile maturity, test instability, coverage gaps per critical journey, and projected return. No obligation to hire. At the end, you have an actionable diagnosis regardless of whether you continue with MTP.
How are tests integrated into the sprint without slowing down the delivery pace?
Tests are designed during refinement (not added at the end), integrated into the real sprint pipeline, and quality gates are executed automatically in the CI/CD. The team perceives that the sprint closes with objective criteria, not additional friction. The first iteration can include a stabilization sprint without impacting the committed roadmap.
What happens to the regression suites the team already has?
They are analyzed in the Quick Assessment. Flaky tests are identified and self-healing is applied. Predictive regression selection per sprint prioritizes what to execute based on the risk of change, reducing total execution time. What exists is not discarded: it is made to work intelligently.
Does the service cover multi-squad and multi-vendor environments?
Yes. MTP operates +300 active simultaneous scrums in banking, retail, and telecommunications with multiple providers. The unified dashboard aggregates metrics from all squads and vendors for consolidated visibility for Management before each release. This is one of the capabilities that distinguishes MTP in the Mexican market.
What happens when MTP finishes the project?
We design the practice, certify the team with ISTQB, and deliver the documented operating model. The capability remains in-house in your organization, not just in our consultants. If MTP leaves, quality continues. This transfer model is part of the contract, not an optional extra.
What agile maturity level is a team normally at before working with MTP?
Most teams we evaluate operate between the Initial and Basic levels of MTP’s agile maturity model: testing outside the sprint or without risk-based prioritization. The Quick Assessment identifies exactly which of the four levels your team is at today and maps the path to the DORA Elite level.
How does AI participate in sprint test prioritization?
AI analyzes the risk of change (module, defect history, flow criticality) to prioritize what to execute in each sprint, with self-healing for existing scripts. The final decision—what is accepted and what is released—is always validated by a person, not the machine.
What evidence is documented for CNBV, Condusef, or SOX audits?
Each sprint closes with objective exit criteria, results of predictive regression selection, and recorded human validation. That evidence remains available in the unified dashboard, without the need to reconstruct anything when the audit arrives.
Which of the three scenarios is your organization in?
The 5-business-day Assessment maps the maturity of your current Agile cycle, the cost of sprint bottlenecks, and the potential ROI of accelerating your QA, with a concrete deliverable to present to management.